The cheapest graphics card to play CoD: Warzone is…
… The NVIDIA RTX 3050 with 8 GB of GDDR6 reminiscence
And it’s a significantly better option than taking pictures for a GTX 1660 for 2 necessary causes. The first of them is that within the RTX we now have the option of utilizing DLSS 2.0 to acquire a sequence of additional frames per second, which is at all times appreciated in this sort of game. The second is due to the fact that the structure of this graphics card is superior and currently the worth distinction is zero. And imagine us that these additional TFLOPS are noticeable within the efficiency of the game.
And what’s the efficiency I can expect to get? Well, fairly passable on a visible stage and so far as the body charge per second is worried.
- If we play Full HD, that’s, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the display screen:
- We get a median of 120 FPS with the graphics on low,
- On the other hand, if we activate the Ray Tracing the common stays past 80 FPS with out the lively DLSS.
- If we activate it, it rises till it’s shut to 120 FPS.
- In the occasion that we play in Quad HD or 2560 x 1440 pixels:
- With low high quality graphics it sits shut to 80 FPS, with steady fluctuations between 75 FPS and simply over 90.
- Surprisingly with RTX lively at that decision, however with out DLSS it sits above 60 FPS, whereas with DLSS it sits north of 80 FPS.
- If you play at 4K we don’t recommend this card, it isn’t acceptable for a game of this style to run at lower than 60 FPS and in low high quality it’s shut to 50 FPS.
- With Ray Tracing lively, the body charge drops to simply over 40 frames per second.
- Ray Tracing+DLSS at 4K; 60FPS.
The data is taken from a PC with an AMD Ryzen 5 5600G 6 core, so the RTX 3050 turns into graphics card to play CoD Warzone at 1080 and 1440p, however we don’t recommend it to play at 4K . The other option is to go for a GTX 1660, which lacks DLSS and reaches Full HD graphics and the identical efficiency in low high quality, however with out entry to DLSS.